The term "model judgment" refers to an action taken by theEuropean Court in response to the growing number ofcomplaints being submitted to the court. These complaintsare typically based on the same violation of rightsguaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights.Essentially، there is a "fundamental issue" within thedomestic legal system of the defendant state. In response،the court، under this procedure، determines the "generalmeasures" that the defendant state must adopt in order toswiftly resolve the "fundamental issue." The court obligesthe concerned state to implement an "internal appeal"process to address "repeated complaints" that have beenpostponed by the court until the required measures aretaken. This judgment differs from other rulings in terms ofits effects، as well as its distinct nature when compared toordinary judgments. The question then arises: to whatextent can one reconcile this distinctiveness with theprinciples governing the European Convention and thescope of the Court’s jurisdiction?.